🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear the manager could survive defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach took on the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, based on his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view him as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, he has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Regarding Formation & Ideology

For example, this was the director , after being involved in the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, such directives carry more weight when delivered from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Authority Behind the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Who else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a modern arena that appears a lot like an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, yet finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Accountability for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without justification. Hire the system coach and then dismiss them for playing excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and then bin them for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.