🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a rising group of countries are moving toward similar bans.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and apps are "stealing our kids' childhood". Legislation is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to approve a bill raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a advisory statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a solid starting point," stated a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Last year, interest grew behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a girl who died after encountering disturbing online content contends that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are secure and suitable for young users," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, legislation is largely occurring at the regional government level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule limiting teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with any further access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted measures requiring guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from certain figures to mimic the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Views

Beyond these regions, additional countries are also exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international bodies adopt a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve safety.

As this global debate continues, the policies of Australia and others demonstrate that states internationally are increasingly content to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.