🔗 Share this article

The federal appeals court has upheld a prohibition on sending national guard in Portland, Oregon, following a recent legal decision.

Appeals Court Agrees to Rehear Legal Matter

The federal appeals court decided on this week that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the president’s authority with an expanded panel of eleven justices. The judicial body also overturned a previous ruling from a smaller judicial group that had supported the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the latest development in a protracted legal battle over whether the former president has the authority and justification to send state military units in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was started in due to months of protests.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has claimed that federal officials at the ICE facility in south Portland were under attack, while city and state officials assert that local officers have control of the situation.

In defiance of descriptions of Portland as “war ravaged”, residents have been sharing videos of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in the city enacted two temporary restraining orders this period – one preventing the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the use of any national guard troops in the state, after attempts to evade the initial injunction by calling up out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – allowing control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling remained in place, blocking the physical sending of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under consideration simultaneously – by a group of 11 judges.

“This ruling demonstrates that the truth matters and that the courts are working to hold this administration accountable. The founding document restricts the executive authority, and local populations cannot be treated as a testing site for unchecked federal authority,” said the legal representative in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a clear message: the executive leader cannot dispatch the military into US cities without cause. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, values, and autonomy as this case progresses and our fight continues in the courts.”