🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to reinitiate atomic discussions with the United States as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue produced results, and disclosed new appeals had been made by go-betweens to resume talks with the US government. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the global atomic watchdog to visit attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Route

Araghchi is walking a complex route since Iran does not want appear to be proceeding from a position of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged stronger defensively and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will never give up" – the main reason of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Discussions Unexpectedly Terminated

The previous five rounds of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the US president asserting the facilities had been destroyed. Following this, Western states exercised their privilege to restore international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iranian officials said they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Officials asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the agreement to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Existing Position

Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be revived in various formats if negotiations resume.

Trump in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to restart talks, but privately Iranian officials say they are not yet getting coherent offers from America either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of inactivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Position

In his address to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the two-week conflict showed the conflict could not be resolved by combat operations. He said the assaults commenced with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were executed with complete American awareness and cooperation, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Diplomacy Continues the Primary Answer

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had fled negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had always attempted to enforce their demands during the talks. Diplomacy can still be active and continues the primary resolution to address disputes, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be adhered to."

"In case they speak to the Iranian people with the language of respect and honor, they will get a response in the identical approach."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of recovery and recovery, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We learned many lessons from this engagement; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He continued: "We effectively endured this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to destroy, remains in place. The installations and gear, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the determination of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have grown more resilient, more integrated, and more backing of the administration and the country in the aftermath of this assault."